<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tips for revision |</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buildyourbusinesswrite.com/tag/tips-for-revision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buildyourbusinesswrite.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>tips for revision |</title>
		<link>http://buildyourbusinesswrite.com/2010/02/23/a-tip-for-revising-your-manuscript/</link>
		<comments>http://buildyourbusinesswrite.com/2010/02/23/a-tip-for-revising-your-manuscript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 14:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revising a manuscript]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revision techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips for revision]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buildyourbusinesswrite.com/?p=614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been said many times that good writing is actually good rewriting, and I certainly think that&#8217;s true. Yet, I also know from experience that it is often unwise to revise too soon. Consider this. When you get a professional critique or an editorial letter, do you immediately read the letter or critique, then rush [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2708/4382321292_59325bbac6_m.jpg" width="240" height="150" alt="Revision takes time" /></center><BR><font size=2></p>
<p>It&#8217;s been said many times that good writing is actually good rewriting, and I certainly think that&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>Yet, I also know from experience that it is often unwise to revise too soon.</p>
<p>Consider this. When you get a professional critique or an editorial letter, do you immediately read the letter or critique, then rush to get the requested revisions done right then and there?</p>
<p>I see many beginning writers do this because: 1) they have a very busy schedule and don&#8217;t want to have these revisions hanging over their head, and 2) they feel it&#8217;s more professional to get things done quickly.</p>
<p>But here&#8217;s the problem with both of those reasons.</p>
<p>First, if your schedule is so packed that you MUST get everything done right away, you need to lighten up a bit. Good writers need time for reflection, even if that means simply reflecting on suggested revisions.</p>
<p>Second, it IS professional to meet deadlines. But again, writers need time for reflection. If you crank out revisions too soon, you won&#8217;t have enough time to mull over what the suggestions really mean and consider all the different ways you could make the suggested revisions.</p>
<p>Next time you get a professional critique or an editorial letter, try this:</p>
<p>1. Read the critique or editorial letter thoroughly. Some of the requested revisions will &#8220;sting&#8221; a bit, but that&#8217;s normal. This sting will subside in a few days &#8211; so don&#8217;t revise when you&#8217;re still feeling the sting.</p>
<p>2. Put the letter or critique aside for a few days and move on to another writing project or something entirely unrelated to writing.</p>
<p>3. Keep the requested revisions in the back of your mind. As you&#8217;re taking a shower, going for a walk, or just cleaning the house, think about what the editor has suggested and WHY he or she feels these changes are necessary.</p>
<p>4. After a few days &#8211; and NOT before &#8211; reread the letter or critique slowly, trying to absorb every change that has been requested. You&#8217;ll probably find yourself thinking that these revisions won&#8217;t be nearly as difficult or painful as you thought they&#8217;d be when you FIRST read the critique or letter.</p>
<p>5. Start to make the requested revisions. And don&#8217;t be a lazy rewriter. Do the best job you can with the revisions. Don&#8217;t try to work at breakneck speed. Take your time. Try to learn from the editorial suggestions and requests you have been given. Remember &#8211; writers need time for reflection &#8211; even when that means simply reflecting on the changes an editor has requested.</p>
<p>So take some time to reflect before you revise.</p>
<p>Try it! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://buildyourbusinesswrite.com/2010/02/23/a-tip-for-revising-your-manuscript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

